Just hook cams - Dating fossils and rocks mike riddle

It’s science and many believe “science” to be synonymous with “always true” and therefore don’t question the data given, even when it contradicts the Bible – which also claims to be always true in information that it affirms.So when the two contradict – as they do with the age of the universe and the earth – many abandon the faith and reject the Genesis account because current science tells them that the universe and the earth is billions of years old, and disregard the biblical account – which indicates an age of about 6,000 years.From the data above, obviously that is not the case.

dating fossils and rocks mike riddle-51

In fact you may have already noticed a number of dead give aways in the above description of the hard science parameter specifications of aircraft performance above.

Those give aways are words like: Precisely quantifying aircraft performance is all about knowing conditions and circumstances.

On the other hand, would I bet my life on the supposed age of a rock, or fossil based on radiometric dating and the testimony of some Ph D scientists?

No, never; and I dare say neither would those same scientists because they know the limitations of the science.

We know the age of those rocks because humans were there to observe the formation. Why this cavalier attitude toward the inaccuracy of all radiometric dating methods?

But when dated by the K-Ar method, did they get an age of a few years old? The K-Ar method showed the age of the newly formed rocks as between 0.35 and 2.8 million years old.[4] Clearly incorrect. Simply because they have a story to protect, namely that “the earth is billions of years old.” Because if the true age of the earth and universe were determined, the secular religious stories of evolution and the Big Bang would be demolished, having been clearly demonstrated to be false.

For take off, a pilot needs to know things like: wind direction and speed, runway direction and length, aircraft weight, air temperature and altitude above sea level, runway condition (wet, dry, snow covered, etc.). And as noted above, those guess have been shown to be consistently wrong.

Given all the needed factors (and pilots are required to know them and plan for them before every flight) a pilot can accurately predict the performance of his aircraft so he can determine whether he can safely take off and conduct the flight. Age is not a quantity that can be directly measured.

Radiometric dating regularly gives different ages for the same object based on the method used.

For example check the variance in ages from samples tested by two different methods.[2]The expectation is that rocks located at the same site would date to the same age regardless of the method used.

Why is there so little confidence in the outcome of radiometric dating that scientist admit that they regularly reject data provided by that means?

Tags: , ,